Steroids in Football

(By Alen Hao Sales Manager from Shenzhen OK Biotech Technology Co., Ltd.（SZOB）)

Steroid policy in football and the NFL as we know it began in 1987. But to understand the use of steroids in football, first we need to take a look at the emerging trends in the high school and collegiate ranks. So what´s going on in high school? Well, if we look at an examination of the heights and weights of members of the annual Parade Magazine´s High School All-American Football Teams from 1963-1971, we see no significant changes in the Body Mass Index of these elite high-school athletes. Now, if we take another look and examine those same players´ heights and weights but this time we compare 1972-1989, we see a clear trend towards an increased pattern in Body Mass Index . These are interesting results, to say the least. If we take a look at an elite collegiate program such as Michigan State University, we see this trend again. In 1975, their average player weighed 213lbs, and by 2005 that weight had jumped to 236lbs .

With regards to football, it would seem that current educational efforts are not working well, either. At the high school level education about steroids was studied on six different. Two football teams received a lecture on steroids and a four-page handout, two of them were given just the handout, and two teams were controls (and didn´t receive any education on steroids). Also, at this level of football, the incidence of self-report of current steroid use was 1.1%. After the education was given to the athletes, focusing of the adverse effects possible with anabolic steroid use, no differences in their attitudes toward the use of anabolic steroids occurred as compared to controls, at all . So that´s the starting point we have to look at anabolic use in professional football. Education, in its current form isn´t changing the attitudes of high-school players, and at the elite level of high-school and college, the players are getting significantly bigger. So what does the landscape of professional football look like? In a story that is very similar to its roots in high school and collegiate football, NFL linemen are weighing well over 300lbs on average today. Roughly 25 years ago, they weighed over fifty pounds less, on average .

The most famous story of steroid use in the NFL is that of Lyle Alzado. Seven years after having a successful career in the NFL, in 1992, Alzado died from brain lymphoma, a very rare form of brain cancer. He was 43 that year, but in the years preceding it, Alzado became an often used symbol of the dangers of steroid abuse. There is absolutely no medical link between steroids and brain lymphoma, and there is absolutely no reason for Alzado to believe his condition was related to steroid use.

The story of Bill Romanowski is probably the next most influential one concerning steroids in football. Although Bill Romanowski wasn´t indicted in the BALCO scandal, he later wrote a book, in which he admits that Victor Conte introduced him to several performance enhancing compounds, notably anabolic steroids .

Although he was a very good linebacker before he used steroids, people often attribute his tackling ability to them. He is probably most famous for his non-playing related antics, however. He spit in J.J. Stokes´ face, broke somebody´s finger at the bottom of a pile up, kicked a downed player in the head several times in one incident, broke a quarterback´s jaw with an illegal helmet to helmet hit, fought former boxer Charles Haley in training camp, often speared wide receivers illegally, broke another players´ ocular cavity, and was always involved in various shoving matches and on field altercations. Unfortunately, this has been attributed, post-facto, to his use of anabolic steroids.

Of course, football players use steroids, and of course this occurs at the high-school, collegiate, and professional levels. It´s a fact of the game that a very skilled but small player will usually get beaten by a very skilled but considerably larger player.

And once again, as long as there is prestige and money to be earned from playing football, there will be steroids in it.

Buy raw steroid powder from China 
We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       
Email：alen@ok-biotech.com
       amy@ok-biotech.com   
Skype: live:alen_358
WhatsAPP: +8618902484839
Www.ok-biotech.com

Steroids in Baseball

(By Alen Hao Sales Manager from Shenzhen OK Biotech Technology Co., Ltd.（SZOB）)

Major league baseball was the last major sports organization in the United States to implement a comprehensive drug testing policy. This all started with a bottle of a nutritional supplement seen in Mark McGwire´s locker. The bottle contained Androstendione, a prohormone, or a compound which can convert into another one inside the body. In this particular case, the compound in question converts to Testosterone once in the body. Unfortunately, at this time, McGwire was en route to breaking a home-run record that had been standing for decades. MGwire retired shortly after breaking that record, but the story of steroids in baseball and the Major League Baseball (MLB) organization went ahead at full speed. Just a few short years later, Ken Caminiti revealed to Sports Illustrated that he used anabolic steroids, and that he estimated roughly fifty percent of the players in the league were using them also. This admission opened the floodgates to the media to begin their full scale assault on MLB. Jose Canseco, in a book published during the height of the steroids in baseball media coverage, estimated that 85% of all players in MLB used steroids, and also admitted using them. Remember the difference between what has been found in scientific studies vs. anecdotal statistics? This is a prime example of one such difference. The players can´t even agree on a percentage, and they´re in the locker-rooms!

Although Caminiti´s story was the earliest major media admission of steroid use by a recently retired former MVP in baseball´s professional ranks, it was one of the most influential. The following is a chart illustrating media attention to steroids in baseball for the weeks preceding and following the Sports Illustrated piece on Caminiti. Week fourteen is when the piece was published. You can see that prior to that, only ten pieces were published in the mainstream media. In the same time (weeks-wise), you can see that hundreds of articles were put out after Caminiti admission:



The most famous story in the steroids in sports is that of Jason Giambi and Barry Bonds. Both of those players were suspected of using anabolic steroids when the BALCO scandal was exposed. Giambi, for his part, told a U.S. grand jury that he used a duo of undetectable steroids known respectively as "the cream" and "the clear," both of which he received from personal trainer Greg Anderson during the 2003 season. Bonds, on the other hand claimed that his trainer told him the substances were the nutritional supplement flaxseed oil and a pain-relieving balm for his arthritis.

There were also claims that a transcript of Bonds´ entire testimony was leaked to the press, and that according to a transcript of Bonds´ Dec. 4, 2003, testimony, he admitted the following were used by him: "the cream," "the clear," human growth hormone, Depo-Testosterone, insulin and a drug for female infertility that can be used to mask steroid use."

Bonds´ attorney, Michael Rains, said the leak of the testimony was simply engineered to discredit Mr. Bonds. However, it´s important to remember that at the time they were not banned by MLB.

So did all this media attention hurt baseball? The answer is a resounding "no". Baseball sales figures and attendance were in a slump before McGwire was en route to his home-run record, and they´ve been climbing ever since. But are all the additional home runs a result of steroid use? Well, it´s easy to say we need to put asterisks on every record set during the "steroid era" of baseball, but that would give too much credit to steroids alone. Of course training methods and nutrition are part of the puzzle, but the other piece is probably not as obvious. In the mid-´90s starting in the American League and in the late ´90s starting in the National League, home runs began to become more and more common.

Although steroids are often blamed, the construction of more "homer-friendly" ballparks also has something to do with it, no doubt. Coors Field, a recent addition to the MLB stable of fields has become the most prolific run-scoring park in the history of MLB. Enron Field was also built (reincarnated into the more media friendly "Minute Maid Park"), actually has a home-run friendly left field line that was (and still may be) a clear violation of major league rules. The Milwaukee Brewers, the Pittsburgh Pirates and Texas Rangers have all also built very homerun-friendly fields in recent years, as have the Arizona Diamondbacks. For their part, the Cardinals, Orioles, and White Sox have pulled in the distance from home-plate to their outfield fence. Need I also add that the strike zone has become much more beneficial to hitters since the era of Roger Maris? Still, the questions remain, about steroids in major league baseball. Do major league baseball players use steroids? Of course they do. Can we say that steroids are the reason for the inflated home-run statistics of recent years? Of course not.

With Multi-Million dollar contracts on the line every season, the only fact that we can be sure of is that steroids are being used in baseball, and they will continue to be used for as long as players can get away with it. Congress recently chimed in and pressured MLB into instituting a comprehensive testing policy for their athletes, but steroid use in baseball is unlikely to decline considerably as a result of it.


Buy raw steroid powder from China 
We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       
Email：alen@ok-biotech.com
       amy@ok-biotech.com   
Skype: live:alen_358
WhatsAPP: +8618902484839
Www.ok-biotech.com

Steroids In Sports

Steroids In Sports

By Alen Hao Sales Manager from Shenzhen OK Biotech Technology Co., Ltd.（SZOB）

The story of steroid use in sports began just before the World Weightlifting Championships of 1954. The Soviets had made their Olympic debut in Helsinki in 1952, and made quite an impact, but nothing compared to the show they put on in 1954. That year, the Soviets easily dominated most of the weight classes. As the story goes, John Ziegler (team physician for the United States) questioned the soviet team´s doctor after the medals were given out, and the soviet doctor said that his team had been receiving testosterone injections. That, in all probability, was the first time anyone had ever used anabolic steroids to enhance performance in an athletic event. According to some unconfirmed sources, testosterone preparations were used by Germany´s Olympic team in 1936 for the Berlin Olympics. At that time, there were rumors that an Olympic medal winner had previously used oral Testosterone preparations, but the benefit to be had from them (due to the technology at the time regarding oral testosterone) would have been minor. In the case of the Soviets, however, rumors of discarded syringes in their dressing rooms made it clear that they were not using oral steroids, they were using something different. And everyone wanted to know what it was.

That wasn't, however, the first time anabolic performance enhancement had been attempted. As far back as the original Olympic Games in ancient Greece, athletes ingested various herbs and foods with the hopes of improving their performance. The big winner in the 480 B.C. Olympic Games said he ate nothing but meat for 10 months prior to the Games. Now we know that meat is especially high in B vitamins and Creatine, both of which can enhance performance. Early attempts to increase Testosterone were documented as early as 776 BC andagain, by Olympic athletes´ ingested sheep´s testicles, which they knew to be a source of Testosterone production (3). Although it might seem extreme to us now, to eat meat for ten straight months (or to ingest sheep testicles), this was a small price to pay for the prize money that was offered back then & up to 1,200 days pay for winning an event was common. There were no participation medals; they did not compete for the love of the game, to give it their best shot, or even for pride. They competed for money and prestige, end of story (1). And that is why they sought out performance enhancers.

If that story sounds familiar, like perhaps one you´ve heard on TV or in magazines concerning modern-day steroid use in sports, it should. Athletes´ today- especially professional athletes- have very lucrative contracts and sponsorship deals, and steroids are known to enhance performance, reduce and repair injuries, and lengthen careers. So it should be no surprise to most people that when Dr.Ziegler returned from the World Weightlifting Championships, he immediately began researching testosterone and trying to develop something better for his Athletes.

What Dr. Ziegler developed, with the help of the Ciba pharmaceutical company was called "Methandrostenolone" or Dianabol. This was the creation of the first anabolic steroid that wasn´t simply testosterone. That was late in 1956. By the time the early 1960s rolled around, Ziegler´s weightlifters were dominating American weightlifting. And since then, many different steroids, each with their own different set of characteristics, have been developed.

By the late 1960´s the East Germans had also entered the fray and were giving steroids to their athletes as part of a state sponsored program to bolster national pride by winning Olympic Gold Medals. In 1968, Dr. Manfred Hoeppner, East Germany´s Chief Medical Officer, wrote and submitted a report to the government in which he recommended the total collective administration of steroids to the entire East German athletes (2). In the couple of decades that followed after this report, the East Germans´ presence was felt at every major world wide sporting event. From the Olympics to World Championships, they took home both medals as well as world records.

Of course, there have been other documented instances of athletes taking various drugs and other substances in an attempt to enhance their performance. Thomas Hicks, an American marathoner in the 1904 Olympics, had to be revived after he drank Brandy lased with cocaine and strychnine. He won the gold medal, although I believe the Brandy/Cocaine/Strychnine cocktail never really took off in popularity among his fellow athletes. His fellow runners, the sprinters attempted to use nitroglycerine a couple of decades later, to dilate (expand) their coronary arteries; they later switched to experimenting with Benzidrine, an amphetamine.

Many of such compounds had been used, but none are as powerful or provided such rapid increases in strength and powerful as anabolic steroids. For this reason, after its invention by Dr.Ziegler, Dianabol was quickly made available to anyone looking for an extra edge. It helped many bodybuilders, weightlifters, football players, and Olympic athletes train harder, longer, and more efficiently. As all steroids can do, it enhanced protein synthesis and allowed new muscle to be built at a rate that was much more rapid than would otherwise be possible. And that increased muscle power and strength translated into financial rewards for the athletes who were taking them.

If you were an athlete looking to take your career farther, Dianabol was going to be an indespensible part of your dietary intake. At this point, the "steroid arms-race" was in full swing. Athletes all over the world wanted to know where to get them and how to use them, and countries were scrambling to develop new steroids and protocols for using them. Then, oddly, in 1968 there was an official complaint about steroids made by the World Health Organization. This complaint wasn´t made by sports authorities, but by the World Health Organization. Steroids were being over produced by the major pharmaceutical firms, and were subsequently shipped to certain third world countries, where doctors would receive a kickback for prescribing large amounts of them. Kenya and Jamaica were the main countries where this was happening, and they (predictably) did very well for themselves at the Olympics that year.

At this time in the United States, professional sports were gaining prominence and athletes began to be able to support themselves by just playing their sport. Notably, at this time, there were no documented reports of athletes using steroids in sports other than Olympic competition. Nonetheless, at this time, a ban on Anabolic steroids was issued by the International Olympic Council, and in the coming decades, most professional sports organizations would follow suit. The original ban on anabolic steroids was enacted for ethical and moral concerns, not safety (as is often thought). Shortly after the first ban on performance enhancers came the first athlete caught breaking that ban. In the 1972, an American swimmer named Rick De Mont was found to be using a newly banned substance- ephedrine. At that time, ephedrine was an approved medication for asthma, and you guessed it- Mr. De Mont was an asthmatic with a prescription for it. Two years prior to that first the 1972 Olympics, Arnold Schwarzenegger won his first of seven Mr. Olympia titles, reportedly with the aid of Dr. Zeigler´s little blue Dianabol pills.

Steroid use in the Olympics went on, for the next couple of decades, in a game of Cat and Mouse between the athletes and the International Olympic Committee. For the most part, the athletes were very successful in avoiding positive drug tests. The East Germans developed several novel compounds to avoid detection, and were only caught when word leaked somehow. For the most part, the Russians and Americans were also very successful at this. Professional bodybuilding also marched onwards with competitors taking ever-increasing amounts of steroids and other drugs, without fear of testing positive.

By the 1990´s, Anabolic Steroids had been absorbed into society, and their use had penetrated every possible sport from the professional ranks down to the High-School level. There were the occasional scandals here and there, but nothing really captured the general public´s attention for very long. In 1987 the National Football League introduced it´s anti-steroid policy, and Major League Baseball was left as the most major sports organization in the world which still had no such policy.

Buy raw steroid powder from China 
We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       
Email：alen@ok-biotech.com
       amy@ok-biotech.com   
Skype: live:alen_358
WhatsAPP: +8618902484839
Www.ok-biotech.com

Do Halotestin, Oral-Turinabol and Methyltestosterone Have Any Advantages Over Dianabol, Anadrol, Anavar and Winstrol?

By Alen Hao Sales Manager from Shenzhen OK Biotech Technology Co., Ltd.（SZOB）

Q: “Why limit the oral choices in my cycles to Dianabol, Anadrol, oxandrolone, or Winstrol? I can get methyltestosterone, Halotestin, or Oral-Turinabol as well.”

A: I think it’s really not a question of limiting.

Combination simply for the sake of combination doesn’t improve results. In contrast, some specific combinations do help, where compounds work synergistically with each other.

These bases are already covered when having the oral anabolic steroids you first mention. Any additional oral anabolic steroid may be used, but when they are used, there’s not a point to adding them to the above. Instead, they might be replacements.

But they would be replacements for no particular reason. I don’t find a special advantage to any of these compounds. An exception certainly can be where experiencing a personal result. If for example an athlete has experienced enhanced endurance performance from Halotestin (most likely from effect on the CNS) then certainly it might be used again even though others may dislike it for water retention reasons. Likewise, if a lifter has found enhanced performance in the gym from methyltestosterone, high might continue to use it, although others might dislike it for its effect on liver values.

In the case of Halotestin, a likely reason for its particular adverse side effect profile is strong inhibition of an enzyme (11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2) which acts to reduce the potency of cortisol. By increasing its effective activity, it could disturb electrolyte balance and cause water retention. Again, this doesn’t mean it can’t be used, but it’s a reason for it to not be in the first tier among oral anabolic steroids.

Oral-Turinabol might be used where a person wishes to use only a single oral steroid and get reasonable mass and strength gains. Generally I don’t see a reason to limiting to only oral use, let alone only one oral compound, but some do want to do it. I’d certainly recommend, for example, a Dianabol/oxandrolone stack instead, though if going oral-only, and even moreso I’d recommend a good injectable/oral stack.

In general, there seem more issues of water retention, adverse effect on blood lipid profiles, and worsened liver values with the latter steroids mentioned than the first group, but not to so great an extent as to rule them out. They simply are not my first choice, and nothing is lost by keeping choice within the first-mentioned orals.

Buy raw steroid powder from China 
We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       
Email：alen@ok-biotech.com
       amy@ok-biotech.com   
Skype: live:alen_358
WhatsAPP: +8618902484839
Www.ok-biotech.com

The Morality of Steroids and the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 1990

By Alen Hao Sales Manager from Shenzhen OK Biotech Technology Co., Ltd.（SZOB）

How Congress succeeded in criminalizing the personal possession of steroids in opposition to all credible medical and scientific testimony

The Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 1990 (ASCA-1990) was passed when President George H.W. Bush signed the Omnibus Crime Control Bill on November 29, 1990. Its passage effectively criminalized the non-medical use of steroids by individuals seeking to enhance their athletic performance or to improve their physical appearance. The law amended the Controlled Substances Act to include anabolic steroids on the Schedule III controlled substance list alongside drugs abused for their psychoactive effects.

The ACSA-1990 authorized the arrest and prosecution of individuals who illegally possessed steroids solely for the purpose of self-administration. Prior to the ACSA-1990, only steroid dealers and medical doctors who illegally distributed steroids were targeted by law enforcement.

The passage of the ACSA-1990 was the culmination of a series of four hearings by the House Subcommittee on Crime and the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. The hearings began with the “Hearings on the Abuse of Steroids in Athletics” in July 1988. The goal of the hearings was to evaluate the possibility of adding anabolic steroids to the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

Public health, medical and scientific experts overwhelmingly advised against the scheduling of steroids. The American Medical Association (AMA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) all unequivocally opposed legislation that scheduled steroids.

Gene R. Haislip, the Deputy Assistant Administrator for the DEA, argued that the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) was “poorly suited” to regulate anabolic steroids. The CSA was never “intended to be a means for controlling substances that are taken primarily for their effects on the physique rather than for their effects on the mind.”

The AMA repeatedly and vehemently proffered recommendations against such legislative action. The AMA was adamant that the “medical facts [did] not support scheduling anabolic steroids under the CSA.”

Dr. Edward Langston, a representative of the AMA, testified that anabolic steroids had multiple legitimate uses in medicine, they could be used safely under medical supervision and they did not meet the physical or psychological dependence criteria required for scheduling under the CSA. Furthermore, scheduling steroids would not reduce the use of steroids and society and would only increase the harms associated with black market steroids.

Congress was undeterred by the inconvenient medical and scientific facts standing between the passage. It was determined to add steroids to the CSA regardless of what health, medical and scientific experts had to say. If Congress couldn’t gain the support of the AMA, FDA, DEA, HHS and NIDA to legislate steroids as a scheduled drug based on public health concerns, they would reframe the issue as a question of morality.

Public health considerations became a secondary concern during the final Congressional hearings on the legislation known as the Anabolic Steroids Control Act of 1990 that occurred on May 17, 1990. The final legislation resulting from the various steroid hearings was transformed into one that focused on solving the problem of “cheating” and protecting the integrity of amateur and professional sports.

Congress didn’t bother to consult any medical or scientific experts during the final hearing prior to voting on the ASCA-1990. Rather it sought the testimony of athletes and representatives of various sports to discuss the morality of steroid use in sports.

The issue of “cheating” with anabolic steroids apparently represented such a grave threat to society that it justified disregarding all recommendations by he AMA, FDA, DEA, HHS and NIDA. The earlier testimony from these agencies was purposely excluded from the Congressional record of the final hearing.

Over twenty years after the bill was passed and vetoed into the law of the land, it is abundantly clear that the ASCA-1990 has been ineffective in addressing the issue of “cheating” in sports. The group of steroid users targeted by the legislative intent of the ASCA has largely been unaffected.

Professional athletes are rarely arrested, prosecuted, convicted or imprisoned for the possession and use of anabolic steroids. There has been no shortage of athletes who have admitted or been caught using steroids. But the ACSA-1990 usually isn’t applied to them.

The individuals that have been affected by the ASCA-1990 are primarily non-athletes, but otherwise gainfully-employed and law-abiding individuals, who use anabolic steroids primarily to improve their physical appearance.

Buy raw steroid powder from China 
We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       
Email：alen@ok-biotech.com
       amy@ok-biotech.com   
Skype: live:alen_358
WhatsAPP: +8618902484839
Www.ok-biotech.com

Do Halotestin, Oral-Turinabol and Methyltestosterone Have Any Advantages Over Dianabol, Anadrol, Anavar and Winstrol?

By Alen Hao Sales Manager from Shenzhen OK Biotech Technology Co., Ltd.（SZOB）

Q: “Why limit the oral choices in my cycles to Dianabol, Anadrol, oxandrolone, or Winstrol? I can get methyltestosterone, Halotestin, or Oral-Turinabol as well.”

A: I think it’s really not a question of limiting.

Combination simply for the sake of combination doesn’t improve results. In contrast, some specific combinations do help, where compounds work synergistically with each other.

These bases are already covered when having the oral anabolic steroids you first mention. Any additional oral anabolic steroid may be used, but when they are used, there’s not a point to adding them to the above. Instead, they might be replacements.

But they would be replacements for no particular reason. I don’t find a special advantage to any of these compounds. An exception certainly can be where experiencing a personal result. If for example an athlete has experienced enhanced endurance performance from Halotestin (most likely from effect on the CNS) then certainly it might be used again even though others may dislike it for water retention reasons. Likewise, if a lifter has found enhanced performance in the gym from methyltestosterone, high might continue to use it, although others might dislike it for its effect on liver values.

In the case of Halotestin, a likely reason for its particular adverse side effect profile is strong inhibition of an enzyme (11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2) which acts to reduce the potency of cortisol. By increasing its effective activity, it could disturb electrolyte balance and cause water retention. Again, this doesn’t mean it can’t be used, but it’s a reason for it to not be in the first tier among oral anabolic steroids.

Oral-Turinabol might be used where a person wishes to use only a single oral steroid and get reasonable mass and strength gains. Generally I don’t see a reason to limiting to only oral use, let alone only one oral compound, but some do want to do it. I’d certainly recommend, for example, a Dianabol/oxandrolone stack instead, though if going oral-only, and even moreso I’d recommend a good injectable/oral stack.

In general, there seem more issues of water retention, adverse effect on blood lipid profiles, and worsened liver values with the latter steroids mentioned than the first group, but not to so great an extent as to rule them out. They simply are not my first choice, and nothing is lost by keeping choice within the first-mentioned orals.

Buy raw steroid powder from China 
We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       
Email：alen@ok-biotech.com
       amy@ok-biotech.com   
Skype: live:alen_358
WhatsAPP: +8618902484839
Www.ok-biotech.com

Trenbolone for the Very First Steroid Cycle

By Alen Hao Sales Manager from Shenzhen OK Biotech Technology Co., Ltd.（SZOB）

Q: “Your articles have two pieces of advice that are totally contrary to recommendations I read on boards everywhere. One, even for a guy’s very first cycle you seem to like choosing trenbolone. Everywhere else, the vets shoot that down when anyone suggests that’s what they want to do for a first cycle. You also write cycles up around a gram per week for first cycles. Same thing. Are those old recommendations which you’ve since changed, or is there a reason behind them?”

A: I still often recommend those kinds of cycles as first cycles.

Why I do so is a combination of experience and some specific reasoning.

I continue to recommend cycles of these types because they work extremely well. They never disappoint. In contrast, cycles of the type often recommended on boards and the like frequently disappoint, or require extended time to provide much result.

There hasn’t been an adverse side effect reason to stop recommending these cycles. With correct combination of steroids, and anti-aromatase use when using larger amounts of aromatizable steroids, side effects at the 1000 mg/week level are usually not problematic for those who are careful with what they are doing.

As for trenbolone, a very small percentage do indeed find it unsuitable for them entirely, but the great majority can use at least 37.5 mg of trenbolone acetate per day, and a large majority have no real problem with 50 mg/day. The most common issue is night sweats, but that’s a harmless price to pay.

When people agree with trenbolone as a suitable choice for later cycles but not the first, this makes no sense as there’s no regard in which previous experience makes a difference. If trenbolone is suitable for an individual, it will be just as suitable in a first cycle as in a later one. Anabolic steroids are not like narcotics: it’s not the case that tolerance must be or is developed.

Why have such fast gains as these higher dose cycles promote, though? Is there really a need for the beginner to make really fast gains, as occurs with such cycles and proper training and nutrition?

Well, a beginner, as with anyone but even moreso, wants to gain some amount. If he can gain an amount he’s thrilled with in a short time, then he’ll be happy with a short cycle. If he gains little in a short period of time, then he won’t be happy with that, and will seek longer cycles.

I would far rather see the beginner use short cycles, no more than 8 weeks and in some instances as little as 2 weeks, and enjoy fast recoveries rather than see him remain on steroids for 12 or 14 weeks, or even longer, trying to eke out results from marginal dosing. There are many reasons for preferring shorter cycles, including better recovery. Short cycles do not work well with marginal dosing.

Buy raw steroid powder from China 
We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       
Email：alen@ok-biotech.com
       amy@ok-biotech.com   
Skype: live:alen_358
WhatsAPP: +8618902484839
Www.ok-biotech.com

An Eight-Week Steroid Cycle with Trenbolone and Dianabol

By Alen Hao Sales Manager from Shenzhen OK Biotech Technology Co., Ltd.（SZOB）

Q: “I’ve done four trenbolone/Dianabol two-week cycles copied from your ‘Jim’ article. The results were great until the last one. I got a total of 25 lb retained muscle from the first three, but only about 3 lb more in the last one. I moved up to 75 mg/day trenbolone acetate for that one, too. That last result has me wanting to do 8 weeks now.

How do I adapt the cycle for 8 weeks? I’m reluctant to push Dianabol for 8 weeks on account of the liver. I have no problems there but don’t want to risk. I would also like to switch from everyday pinning. That’s okay for 2 weeks but always by the end of the second week I’m glad it’s over.”

A: I’ll be glad to answer your question just as asked and provide an example 8 week trenbolone/Dianabol cycle. But, I’d like to comment on getting 3 lb further retained muscle in the last two-week cycle.

While not seeming spectacular, as your earlier cycles were, that amount or even much less can actually be a great result.

Lee Haney often made the point that his gains over his Mr Olympia reign (1984-1991) were consistently 3 lb per year. He was a realist, and was communicating that as a successful competitor those were his results.

Of course, at the start of this period, he was more advanced than you are, so his gains were slower than what’s still available to you.

But the point is, three pounds of retained muscle is not at all bad for two weeks time. As it’s possible to do eight 2 on / 4 off cycles per year, or thirteen 2 on / 2 off cycles, one could achieve even less per cycle and be very well ahead for the year.

That said, let’s adapt your cycle for eight weeks!

The trenbolone program will be trenbolone enanthate 700 mg on Day 1, and 200 mg every other day throughout Weeks 1-6. In weeks 7 and 8, you’ll switch to trenbolone acetate 75 mg/day, with the last injection being on the fourth day of Week 8.

You need about 40% more trenbolone enanthate than acetate to have an equal amount of trenbolone, because the ester adds more weight. This is why the milligram amount is increased compared to your previous cycles.

On the Dianabol usage, your concern on the timeframe brings up an interesting point. I think the main area where my cycle planning likely can be advanced is with regard to orals. The six-week limitation is an extremely well-proven approach, and when broken there have been cases where liver values were poor by the 8-week point. But that was prior to TUDCA. I doubt that TUDCA is a cure-all for the liver issues of alkylated steroids, but it’s possible it may help enough to make routine 8-week use acceptable. I mean acceptable in the sense that it can be recommended to thousands of people and not harm any of them.

If it were me, and at some near point I will do it, I’d try the Dianabol at 50 mg/day with TUDCA 500 mg/day with intention to probably do all 8 weeks with the Dianabol. However, I’d do a liver test at 6 weeks and would discontinue use if serum bilirubin or GGT were outside the normal range. My replacement for Dianabol 50 mg/day would be testosterone propionate 50 mg/day.

(I don’t think there’s exact equivalence there: the testosterone is a less effective combination with the trenbolone but for just two weeks it will do.)

If you do choose to limit your Dianabol use to 6 weeks, then I’d do the first two weeks with testosterone propionate 50 mg/day, with 150 mg on Day 1, and begin Dianabol in Week 3.

As you didn’t mention using an anti-aromatase, I’m supposing your personal experience is you can use Dianabol at 50 mg/day without estrogen problem. However, if you did need an an anti-aromatase, then use the same as you did before.

You can also use the same PCT as before, for example Clomid 300 mg on Day 1 as three doses of 100 mg, followed by 50 mg/day for most likely 4 weeks, and until you’re completely confident of full recovery.

Buy raw steroid powder from China 
We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       
Email：alen@ok-biotech.com
       amy@ok-biotech.com   
Skype: live:alen_358
WhatsAPP: +8618902484839
Www.ok-biotech.com

The Perfect 8-Week Testosterone-Based Steroid Cycle

June 9, 2016 By Alen hao

Q: “What’s an example of a complete 8 week testosterone based cycle, using say 750 mg/week testosterone and no other anabolic steroids? Counting PCT and including everything that is necessary or best to include. And what are the reasons behind the details, and why would the plan be better than typical recommendations?”
A: For this 8 week plan, I’d start with testosterone enanthate, three injections per week of 250 mg. The reason for dividing into two injections is the half-life is not long enough for a single injection per week to give steady levels.
On Day 1, I wouldn’t inject just 500 mg, however. Doing so wouldn’t bring blood levels where they need to be. With ongoing injections of 250 mg three times per week, it would be about a month before levels would be properly established. For better results, on Day 1 I’d inject about 750 mg as a frontload (five days’ worth, plus the usual daily amount, because the half life is about five days.) This would fairly promptly get levels where they need to be and where they’ll remain with ongoing 750 mg/week dosing.
I’d start letrozole (Arimidex could be chosen instead) at for example about 0.7mg/day, though the needed amount could be somewhat more or less. For the same reason as with the testosterone enanthate, there would be a frontload on Day 1, though here the frontload would be a triple dose, in this case 2.1 mg.
During the cycle, if sensing any sign of low estradiol such as reduced libido, depression, or joint pain I’d discontinue letrozole for 2 days, then resume at lower dose. I might get a blood test for estradiol at the two week point.
With an 8 week cycle, I wouldn’t really need HCG, but optionally could use it at 250 IU three times per week nearly throughout the cycle, until finishing a 5000 IU vial. Alternately, I might use it in just the last four weeks of the cycle, or not at all.
I won’t want to keep using testosterone enanthate through the end of Week 8, because levels would still be elevated in the next week and even into the week past that. Recovery couldn’t begin in Week 9, as I’d intend for an 8 week cycle.
So I’ll use testosterone enanthate for Weeks 1-6, but then switch to testosterone propionate 100 mg/day. I’d end its use in the middle of Week 8, so that levels will fall sufficiently for recovery to begin in the next week as planned. (Ideally I’d add orals for the last half of the week, but as this is a testosterone-only cycle, we’ll omit that.)
I’d discontinue letrozole with the last testosterone propionate injection.
On Day 1 of Week 9, I’d start PCT with Clomid 300 mg (100 mg taken three times), and then 50 mg/day for typically 4 weeks.
And that would be a basic eight-week 750 mg/week testosterone cycle.
The plan would be better than typical recommendations because it achieves effective levels as quickly as possible, maintains them for as long as possible during the planned cycle length, and transitions nearly as rapidly as possible to levels allowing recovery.
I favor either being at effective levels, or being at levels allowing recovery. Being at transitional levels that aren’t very anabolic yet are suppressive is a waste of time.

	TEST ENANTHATE	TEST PROPIONATE	LETROZOLE	HCG	CLOMID
Week 1
M	750mg (frontload)		2.1mg (frontload)
	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
W	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
F	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
S			0.7mg
S			0.7mg
Week 2
M	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
W	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
F	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
S			0.7mg
S			0.7mg
Week 3
M	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
W	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
F	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
S			0.7mg
S			0.7mg
Week 4
M	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
W	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
F	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
S			0.7mg
S			0.7mg
Week 5
M	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
W	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
F	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
S			0.7mg
S			0.7mg
Week 6
M	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
W	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
T			0.7mg
F	250mg		0.7mg	250iu
S			0.7mg
S			0.7mg
Week 7
M		100mg	0.7mg	250iu
T		100mg	0.7mg
W		100mg	0.7mg	250iu
T		100mg	0.7mg
F		100mg	0.7mg
S		100mg	0.7mg
S		100mg	0.7mg
Week 8
M		100mg	0.7mg
T		100mg	0.7mg
W		100mg	0.7mg
T
F
S
S
Week 9
M					300mg
T					50mg
W					50mg
T					50mg
F					50mg
S					50mg
S					50mg
Week 10
M					50mg
T					50mg
W					50mg
T					50mg
F					50mg
S					50mg
S					50mg
Week 11
M					50mg
T					50mg
W					50mg
T					50mg
F					50mg
S					50mg
S					50mg
Week 12
M					50mg
T					50mg
W					50mg
T					50mg
F					50mg
S					50mg
S					50mg

Bill Alen Hao provides his recommendations for the perfect 8-week testosterone-based steroid cycle
Buy raw steroid powder or HGH from China We can ship to worldwide with safe package..More details at       

Email：alen@ok-biotech.com       amy@ok-biotech.com   

Skype: live:alen_358

WhatsAPP: +8618902484839

Www.ok-biotech.com

The Perfect 8-Week Testosterone-Based Steroid Cycle